The Mysterious Case of Mr. W and His Whereabouts
He was a big man and he had a personality to match. He has a
very large family and they are good people. His life seems to have come to an
abrupt end after 83 years of presence. Of course, my question is still this:
Where is he now? 
If reality is truly virtual, then Mr. W himself should
easily be able to answer this question and I should easily be able to record his
answer here. But when I ask, either Mr. W, or The Akashic Librarian, only silence
returns. If consciousness is a physical property, then Mr. W's huge
personality is presently in a state of decay.
I am no scientist by definition, but I do think it is
necessary to measure results before publishing theories. In theory, it would
seem Mr. W could not possibly have disappeared and returned to
whatever he was before his birth. However, when we measure Mr. W, from
the place where we live and where he once lived, we see a fading avatar and no
measurement proves that Mr. W continues in any way. Logically, he is no more.
Logically, he occupied only one window of time, which lasted 83 human-years and
he has now expired in every way.  
That would be the best, scientific answer. 
But in my personal view, there is one element left to
consider; and when considered, it comes as close to proof as the science has.
That element is Love. 
Way back when scientists were first theorizing about quantum
physics, the trouble with entanglement emerged. This idea was impossible to
overlook and it was impossible to have the other theories without it. Einstein
famously called it “Spooky”. 
I see no reason to attempt to explain quantum entanglement.
While it may not be clearly understood by laypeople, We have mostly,
collectively, come to accept the idea. Scientist are almost universally in
agreement in this area of study. As a layperson, I rely on scientists to test
these theories and report on them. I’m satisfied that this spooky, quantum entanglement
is a very sound science indeed. 
My theory regarding the whereabouts of Mr. W does
not have the support of scientific research, but I am a witness to the
entanglement present between the unseen Mr. W and his visible Loved ones. 
I have not been able to work out a theory which might show
how there could possibly be so significant a degree of the most significant
Life Force, still entangling a living human with one which no longer exists. 
Science probably won’t touch this in my lifetime, but when
you lose a loved one, you do not experience the diminishing of The Love you
once shared with that other person. The longer you think about this, and even
press the issue, the more you will come to think of Love as the spookiest of
all actions at the greatest of all distances. 
It is a simple question, but grief alone does not answer it.
“How could you Love what does not exist?”
Do we love our departed loved ones based on our memories
alone? 
What are memories? Is memory a psychological process for
storing information? 
Let’s assume it is. What then, does a grieving, loved one
Love? 
If memory is information, and if death deletes the original
phenomenal source-object which caused the information to begin with, and we
find that we Love someone beyond their death, then we have to simultaneously affirm
that it is possible for us to Love information. 
It is possible that we sometimes have an advantage when we
allow ourselves to feel for answers rather than rather than relying only on testable
data. 
In the mysterious case of  Mr. W and his
whereabouts, the data tells us that he is now only information, and his loved
ones now find themselves loving that information. But in our hearts, where it
seems we have such experiences, we know that our Love for the departed is an unbreakable
link to the departed; it is not information that we love. 
There is but One Song, and it is our Universe. When a melody
has been played, it is forever a part of the entire piece. If it were just
sound, it could be silenced. If it were just memories, it could be forgotten. If
it were words, they could be erased. Try not to Love someone you Love. Of course
this is impossible. The dimensions of Love are not measurable within a period
of time or in a space. 
Your Love for another is not tethered to your heart on one
end and to information on the other. It is a link between two hearts, and
exists as that link beyond the lifespan of information. It is not only possible
to Love the departed, it is possible to experience that Love as it continues to
grow. 
You won’t be able to define Love or put it into words, but
you are aware of it. Love, therefore, is not an object, subject to decay. The
deepest mystery regarding The Entanglement of Love is not that it remains when
a loved one dies; the deepest of all mysteries is that Love remains when you both
die.
Awareness of  Love requires transcendence of thought. We don’t
think we love our loved ones. We are aware of our Love and it does not require
any information to exist; knowing this is awareness. What remains of Love
beyond death is all that we can presently be aware of and yet still not know or understand.
God bless the family of Mr. W. You will see him again some day.
Comments
Post a Comment